Connect with us
Financial Press
brett-arends's-roi:-uh-oh:-investors-predict-‘dow-50,000’-—-in-just-five-years
brett-arends's-roi:-uh-oh:-investors-predict-‘dow-50,000’-—-in-just-five-years

Breaking

Brett Arends's ROI: Uh-oh: Investors predict ‘Dow 50,000’ — in just five years

Brett Arends’s ROI

New poll suggests ominous euphoria


Mary Evans/Ronald Grant/Everett Collection

The average U.S. investor must be even higher than the stock market.

What else can explain the results of a new survey, which found that, among a sample of 1,500 people here in the U.S. who manage their portfolios, the average person expected the stock market to generate sky-high returns of 15.4% a year over the next five years?

After accounting for dividends, that would mean stock prices would nearly double by 2025, with the S&P 500
SPX,
+0.37%

topping 6,000 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
-0.24%

hitting about 52,000.

Yikes.

If that happens we can all achieve “Financial Independence” and “Retire Early” to the beach. Just in time for the robots, artificial intelligence and self-driving cars to do all the work.

Oh, and this forecast was the average in the survey. Heaven knows what the optimists expect.

The poll was conducted by global money-management firm Schroders, which surveyed 23,450 private investors in 32 countries around the world. About 10% were already retired, and the other 90% were presumably saving for retirement.

Those in the U.S., by the way, came out as by far the most optimistic — or possibly deluded — in the world. The Japanese are expecting returns to be less than half as much as folks here.

As the overwhelming bulk of U.S. investors’ stock investments are here at home, we have to assume they are expecting these heroic returns from U.S. stocks.

Hmmm.

For those of us saving for our retirement, this is precisely the sort of thing that affects us. After all, if we think the stock market might plausibly generate sky-high returns over the next five years, it’s a good reason to take on plenty of “risk.” If I thought this was a realistic outcome I’d basically want to be almost entirely in stocks.

So: How likely is it?

Well, almost anything can happen on Wall Street, and generally does, so this is not a mathematical impossibility.

Don’t miss:Should I still use the 60/40 investing rule for retirement?

But, well, good luck.

That would mean that U.S. stocks, already valued at a wacko 43% of the entire planet’s GDP, would rise to 60% or even 70%.

Since reliable data began in the 1920s, U.S. stocks have produced average compound returns of about 6.5% a year on top of consumer price inflation.

As there is no inflation at the moment, and the bond market is predicting little or none for the next five years, this means investors today are expecting stocks to produce twice their average returns for the next five years.

Or maybe they are expecting inflation to come roaring back but stocks to carry on rising anyway.

Read:Why life will never be the same for people over 60, even with a vaccine

Never mind that the S&P 500‎ is now trading at 25 times 2021 per-share earnings, 33 times the average earnings of the last 10 years, and somewhere between 1.5 and 2 times the replacement cost of assets, known to economists as Tobin’s q.

All three historic measures have long-term track records of anticipating future returns. None is perfect, and each is up for debate. But by all three measures S&P 500 valuation today is up in the nosebleed section.

It’s one thing to produce terrific stock-market returns from a low base. It’s another to produce them when stocks are already expensive.

Yes, stocks have sometimes doubled your money over a period of five years, when adjusted for inflation. Going back to the 1920s that’s happened about one year in six. But most of those happened in the big boom just after the second world war, or the mania of the late 1990s.

The average five-year gain is half as much.

And the big gains typically come when the market is cheap. To expect the same returns when the market is expensive is to start assuming valuations don’t matter. Actually, it’s to start assuming valuations matter in reverse — because the higher stocks go, the more ambitious investors become about future returns.

“Our results show that 80% of people are still basing their predictions on the returns they have received in the past,” notes Schroders in the report. No kidding.

Behavioral finance has a term for that. It’s called “recency bias.” It’s an established cognitive error that plagues us all. We humans have a tendency to extrapolate the future from the recent past.

It’s a longstanding Wall Street phenomenon, and the historical record is not good.

It is, ominously, generally near market peaks when investors are most bullish. Whether we’ll have a crash or a bear market is another matter.

Yes, 15% could technically happen. But I wouldn’t bet on it.

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Breaking

Well, this is unfortunate… The story you requested could not be found. To find what you’re looking for, try one of these options. MarketWatch...

Breaking

Well, this is unfortunate… The story you requested could not be found. To find what you’re looking for, try one of these options. MarketWatch...

Breaking

Well, this is unfortunate… The story you requested could not be found. To find what you’re looking for, try one of these options. MarketWatch...

Breaking

Well, this is unfortunate… The story you requested could not be found. To find what you’re looking for, try one of these options. MarketWatch...